0000002309 00000 n why it shall be said not to be equally in operation here. 's dissent. As secretary of state, Marshall had signed a number of the. The Sovereign, by that law is (as it is termed) universal occupant. Six of the judges agreed that the Meriam people did have traditional ownership of their land, with Justice Dawson dissenting from the majority judgment. 0000004228 00000 n 1992 High Court of Australia decision which recognised native title. You can search the Collection online or visit the Stanner Reading Room to view or listen to collection items and conduct research. The full judgments are available online. By closing this message, you are consenting to our use of cookies. Six of the judges agreed that the Meriam people did have traditional ownership of their land, with Justice Dawson dissenting from the majority judgment. [9] However, ownership is not 'one way' under this system of law, and an individual both owns the land and is owned by it. Mabo v Queensland (No 1), [1] was a significant court case decided in the High Court of Australia on 8 December 1988. The second empire is defined by P. J. Marshall as the British Empire of the late eighteenth century, which ceased to consist primarily of communities of free settlers of British origin and became an empire of peoples who were not British in origin and who had been incorporated into the empire by conquest and who were ruled without representation (Marshall, 2001 cited by Hussain, 2003 Hussain, N. 2003. 's reasoning. 0000003346 00000 n Why was Eddie Mabo important to the land rights movement? Justice Brennan (with whom Mason CJ and McHugh J agreed) \vrote the leading judgment. How do I view content? We improve outcomes for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples by ensuring there is more involvement and agency in research projects. 0000007955 00000 n 0000000596 00000 n Richard Bartlett, "The Proprietary Nature of Native Title" (1998) 6, This page was last edited on 25 February 2023, at 06:37. [16] The State of Queensland was the respondent to the proceeding and argued that native title rights had never existed in Australia and even if it did they had been removed due to (at the latest) the passage of the Land Act 1910 (Qld). This test has been used in later cases[Note 1] to establish whether or not a person is Indigenous. More generally, Reynolds assembles a range The Mabo Case was a significant legal case in Australia that recognised the land rights of the Meriam people, traditional owners of the Murray Islands (which include the islands of Mer, Dauer and Waier) in the Torres Strait. 1. See all, Brennan, Chief Justice Gerard, Canada, crown land, Dawson, Justice, Deane, Sir William, extinguishment, Gaudron, Justice Mary, Guerin v The Queen, High Court of Australia, International Court Case, Mabo judgement, Mabo v Queensland No.1, Mabo v Queensland No.2, Mason, Chief Justice Anthony, native title, Queensland Coast Islands Declaratory Act , 1985 , Racial Discrimination Act, sovereignty, Toohey, Justice , United States of America, Brennan, Chief Justice Gerard, Brennan, Justice Gerard, Dauar, Dawson, Justice, Deane, Sir William, extinguishment, Gaudron, Justice Mary, Waier, Brennan, Justice Gerard, crown land, Dawson, Justice, Deane, Sir William, Gaudron, Justice Mary, High Court judgement, High Court of Australia, Mabo judgement, Mabo v Queensland No.2, Mason, Chief Justice Anthony, McHugh, Justice Michael, Mer, native title, Order of the Court, Toohey, Justice, Brennan, Justice Gerard, crown land, Dawson, Justice, Deane, Sir William, Gaudron, Justice Mary, High Court judgement, Mason, Chief Justice Anthony, McHugh, Justice Michael, Mer, native title, Order of the Court, Toohey, Justice. Robert Harlan, a freed slave, achieved renown despite the court's decisions. The significant role played by bitcoin for businesses! We are Australia's only national institution focused exclusively on the diverse history, cultures and heritage of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australia. Furthermore, because of pervasive discrimination against Aborigines in relation to citizenship, education, living standards, access to the professions and the right to select land, the traditional owners had neither the means nor the opportunity to press their claims to land. "Do not use justice for blacks as excuse to destroy this nation," says Bob Woodson. This item is part of a JSTOR Collection. University of Sydney News , 15 March. In Plessy v. Ferguson it approved the legal architecture of segregation. On 3 June 1992 the High Court of Australia recognised that a group of Torres Strait Islanders, led by Eddie Mabo, held ownership of Mer (Murray Island). [2] Paul Keating, Prime Minister of Australia at the time, praised the decision in his Redfern Speech, saying that it "establishes a fundamental truth, and lays the basis for justice". ( 2006 ). The islands have been inhabited by the Meriam people (a group of Torres Strait Islanders) for between 300 and 2000 years. As a result, the High Court had to consider whether the Queensland legislation was valid and effective. Browse some of our featured collections which have been digitised as part of our ongoing preservation work. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page. While Brennan, J. I think the court of that period has gotten way too little attention in history because it was responsible, essentially, for segregation and clearing the way for segregation. Melbourne : Black Ink Agenda . Tuhiwai Smith (1999 Tuhiwai Smith, L. 1999. This case became known asMabo v. Queensland (No. I use the words could not be pressed rather than were not pressed to make the point that, in the cases I am discussing (from Att.-Gen. v. Brown to Williams v. Att.-Gen. Williams v. Att.-Gen. (New South Wales) (1913), 16 CLR 404 . 7. Mabo was born Eddie Koiki Sambo but he changed his surname to Mabo when he was adopted by his uncle, Benny Mabo. It was not until 3 June 1992 that Mabo No. "[12], In 1879 the islands were formally annexed by the State of Queensland. 0000004136 00000 n [6] Under this law, the entirety of Mer is owned by different Meriam land owners and there is no concept of public ownership. Mabo v Queensland (No 2) (commonly known as the Mabo case or simply Mabo) is a landmark decision of the High Court of Australia that recognised the existence of Native Title in Australia. [Crossref],[Google Scholar], p. 96, see also pp. I am grateful to Professor W. Wesley Pue for helping me to clarify my understanding of this aspect of Brennan, J. Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people should be aware that this website may contain images, voices and names of deceased persons. That sovereignty delivered complete ownership of all land in the new Colony to the Crown, abolishing any existing rights that may have existed previously. The High Court of Australia's decision in Mabo v. Queensland (No. Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below: If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. In 2015, 23 years after the decision, Eddie Mabo was honoured by the Sydney Observatory in a star naming ceremony, a fitting and culturally significant moment in our nations history. It took generations, but eventually the dissenter won. 0000009848 00000 n Manne , R. (2003) . [8] Unlike western law, title to land is orally based, although there is also a written tradition introduced to comply with State and Commonwealth inheritance and welfare laws. On the assumption that Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples had no concept of land ownership before the arrival of British colonisers in 1788 (terra nullius). Register a free Taylor & Francis Online account today to boost your research and gain these benefits: Journal for the Study of Race, Nation and Culture, Anywhere But Here: Race and Empire in the Mabo Decision, /doi/full/10.1080/13504630701696435?needAccess=true, Imperialism, history, writing, and theory, The Blainey view: Geoffrey Blainey ponders Mabo, the High Court and democracy, Nation and miscegenation: Discursive continuity in the Post-, Yorta Yorta Aboriginal Community (Members) v. Victoria. The Mabo Case was a significant legal case in Australia that recognised the land rights of the Meriam people, traditional owners of the Murray Islands (which include the islands of Mer, Dauer and Waier) in the Torres Strait. 0000001056 00000 n 2. Except as identified in the text of this article, Mason, C.J., Deane, Toohey, Gaudron and McHugh, JJ. It commemorates Mer Island man Eddie Koiki Mabo and his successful efforts to overturn the legal fiction of terra nullius, or land belonging to no-one. Who are the people involved in the Mabo case? Justice Dawson, however, held that such rights exist only if recognised or acquiesced in by the Crown, and that this did not happen in this case. The Native Title Research and Access Service is your first stop for information about the native title resources in the AIATSIS collection. [Google Scholar]) for a description of the phases of colonization as they relate to Aboriginal Australians. 0000003049 00000 n Skip to document. Very simply put, Justice Blackburn found that no such rights existed in The majority opinion is an abomination. 0000002568 00000 n hide caption. Mason CJ, Wilson, Brennan, Deane, Dawson Toohey & Gaudron JJ. "Do you remember Eddie Mabos case, that court case about land?" All that remains of Henry Lane's shack at Pudman, built around 1880. [35], In 2009 as part of the Q150 celebrations, the Mabo High Court of Australia decision was announced as one of the Q150 Icons of Queensland for its role as a "Defining Moment". Register to receive personalised research and resources by email. London & New York: Zed Books. xb```f``f`^|QXcG =N{"C_2`\. 3099067 [1] It was brought by Eddie Mabo against the State of Queensland and decided on 3 June 1992. The great Australian history wars . [1] It was brought by Eddie Mabo against the State of Queensland and decided on 3 June 1992. 5 Howick Place | London | SW1P 1WG. The key fault line in the Supreme Court that Donald Trump built is not the ideological clash between right and left it's the increasingly acrimonious conflict within the court's now-dominant. Native title could be extinguished by a valid exercise of government power that was inconsistent with an ongoing native title interest. Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine. and In this article, I explore the competing visions of legal history that are implicit within Brennan J's leading judgment and Dawson J's dissent. See, for example, the methodology adopted by Keith Windschuttle (2002 Windschuttle, K. 2002. NOTE: Only lines in the current paragraph are shown. owned by no one) at the time of British settlement, and recognised that Indigenous rights to land existed by virtue of traditional customs and laws and these rights had not been wholly lost upon colonisation. 0000004321 00000 n [19] However, these rights were not absolute and may be extinguished by validly enacted State or Commonwealth legislation or grants of land rights inconsistent with native title rights. 0000014396 00000 n The case is notable for being the first in Australia to recognise pre-colonial land interests of Indigenous Australians within the common law of Australia. His Honor thought, however, that if land was in fact occupied, as was much of Australia, the common law protected the indigenous rights of the occupiers. Join us on Noongar boodja for the Summit 2023, co-convened with South West Aboriginal Land and Sea Council. 0000004453 00000 n trailer I hope that doesn't happen, and there's certainly a lot of history in the Supreme Court to suggest that justices who are appointed with one set of expectations end up completely defying them. [33][34], The case was referenced in the 1997 comedy The Castle, as an icon of legal rightness, embodied in the quote "In summing up, its the Constitution, its Mabo, its justice, its law, its the vibe". The court ruled in favour of . "Well, those judges, they told us their decision just now: Eddie won. The five Meriam people who mounted the case were Eddie Koiki Mabo, Reverend David Passi, Sam Passi, James Rice and one Meriam women, Celuia Mapo Sale. The case presented by Eddie Mabo and the people of Mer successfully proved that Meriam custom and laws are fundamental to their traditional system of ownership and underpin their traditional rights and obligations in relation to land. In Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples, Edited by: Tuhiwai Smith, L. 1941. Ngunnawal identity Matilda House (nee Williams) and elder sister of Harry "Crow" Williams, with Aunty Vi Bolger, now in her 90s. These six judgments in the Mabo case comprise hundreds of pages, of which just three pages are shown here. The judges held that British I think it suggests the parallels between that era and this era. Retrieved 9 October 2007 from http://www.usyd.edu.au/news/ [Google Scholar] for more thorough reviews of Connor's book, including some suggestions that Connor may also have permitted himself the odd sleight of hand in making his case for the culpable invention of terra nullius. 's efforts to render contemporary justice for past wrongs against indigenous Australians deserve acknowledgement, though his judgment is ultimately constrained by the force at the heart of the Australian common law. He says in that dissent, what can more surely sow the seeds of racial discord than a system under the law that creates two separate systems of rights, one for Blacks and one for whites? Justices Deane and Gaudron (in a joint judgment) and Toohey J substantially agreed with Brennan J subject to one difference of opinion noted below. Paradoxically, the Wik decision evoked a much more swift and hostile reaction . [2], The Prime Minister Paul Keating during his Redfern speech praised the decision, saying saying it "establishes a fundamental truth, and lays the basis for justice". Increase public engagement in science and ensure people have a voice in decisions that affect them Rather, the Milirrpum case was, for a combination of historical reasons, the first occasion on which an Aboriginal plaintiff brought a native title case before an Australian court and the first time that an Australian or English court was required to rule directly, as opposed to obliquely, on the question of whether native title survived the transfer of sovereignty over Australian territory to the Crown. We have produced a range of resources, databases, indexes, finding aids and reading lists to help you with your research and to find information in our Collection. What does Mabo Day commemorate for kids? During this time he became involved in community and political organisations, such as the union movement and the 1967 Referendum campaign. Justice Toohey, in a separate opinion, agreed with Justice Brennan that it was unacceptable that inhabited land could be considered terra nullius. A new book explores the life of U.S. Supreme Court Justice John Marshall Harlan, who, through his writing, made history even though he lost. Dawson, J. dissented. Search and explore the AIATSIS Collection of more than 1 million items related to Australian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultures and histories. later. Learn about the different sources of family history information. It also revealed the first opposition from some Islanders to the claims being made: two Islanders were called by Queensland during these sittings to oppose Eddie Mabos claims. Brian Keon-Cohen, Barrister[i]. %%EOF 0000002660 00000 n AIPS achieves its objectives through an extensive network of partners spanning universities, government, industry and community. Justice Dawson dissented. photocopies or electronic copies of newspapers pages. trailer [i] From Keon-Cohen, B A, 'The Mabo Litigation: A Personal and Procedural Account'[2000] MelbULawRw 35; (2000) 24(3) Melbourne University Law Review 893. Dr. Dawson is a bumbler who has a good heart and joins Basil on their hunt to find Mr. Flaversham, Olivia's father, from the diabolical Professor Ratigan. [Screams of what I took to be joy, laughter, yelling, much discussion in the background.] This landmark decision gave rise to . Retrieved 15 January 2006 from http://home.vicnet.net.au/ [Google Scholar] and Fitzmaurice, 2006 Click on current line of text for options. We also have a range of useful teacher resources within our collection. We recognise that our staff and volunteers are our most valuable asset. Why did Justice Dawson dissent in Mabo? It also led to the Australian Parliament passing the Native Title Act in 1993. 27374). Please enable JavaScript in your browser to get the full Trove experience. Read about what you should know before you begin. Follow our steps for doing family history research. 0000000016 00000 n Mabo Day is marked annually on 3 June. Judges have taken the opportunity to write dissenting opinions as a means to voice their concerns or express hope for the future. John Marshall Harlan, who was named for Chief Justice John Marshall, served on the Supreme Court from 1877 until his death in 1911. It was not until 3 June 1992 that Mabo No. The Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies. As such, they have the responsibility to care and share it with their clan or family and maintain it for future generations. AIATSIS holds the worlds largest collection dedicated to Australian. [Google Scholar] FCAFC 110 on the question of whether illegal acts of a pastoral leaseholder can extinguish native title; and Members of the Yorta Yorta Aboriginal Community v. Victoria (2002 Yorta Yorta Aboriginal Community (Members) v. Victoria (2002), 214 CLR 422 . Paul Keating, speech delivered at Redfern Park in Sydney on 10 December 1992. In the aftermath of the great depression and an subsequent cut in wages, Islanders in 1936 joined a strike instigated by Mer Islanders. Photo by MARTIN PIERIS, Ngunnawal families pose with the settler Whittaker family. Social Analysis, 36: 93152. Photo courtesy of tho Russell Family, http://nla.gov.au/nla.news-article127232465, create private tags and comments, readable only by you, and. The old saying holds that history is written by the winners. Justice Moynihan resumed the hearing of the facts in the case presented by Eddie Mabo and the people of Mer with sittings taking place on Murray Island as well as on the mainland. %%EOF [26] Native title doctrine was eventually codified in statute by the Keating Government in the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth). We welcome donations of unpublished materials relating to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander studies, culture, knowledge, and experience. [Google Scholar]) argues persuasively that to speak of the post-colonial obscures the present and continuing incursion of white values, philosophies and mores into indigenous culture and society in societies such as Australia. Lane, 1996 Lane, P. H. 1996. These included questions as to the validity of titles issued which were subject to the Racial Discrimination Act 1975 (Cth), the permissibility of future development of land affected by native title, and procedures for determining whether native title existed in land. No. Madison (1803), which stemmed from a flurry of Federalist judicial appointments made in the last weeks of the Adams administration. In 1973 Mabo founded the Black Community School in Townsville, which was created to educate Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children and preserve traditional knowledge and practices. Dr. David Q. Dawson is the deuteragonist of Disney's 1986 animated feature film, The Great Mouse Detective. Ngurra: The National Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Cultural Precinct will be nationally significant in speaking to the central place that Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples hold in Australias story. agreed for relevant purposes with Brennan, J. Mabo is of great legal, historical, and political importance to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australians. 0000007289 00000 n In the weeks before Thomas Jefferson's inauguration as president in March . 0000014584 00000 n 'Separate' Is An Eye-Opening Journey Through Some Of America's Darkest Passages, Where Redistricting Fights Stand Across The Country. The Stanner Reading Room and client access rooms will be closed from Wednesday 15th through to Friday 17th March 2023 for the Wentworth Lecture. Justice Brennan (with whom Chief Justice Mason and Justice McHugh agreed) envisaged that his decision would afford a new, just and appropriate "skeleton of the conunon law" in Australia concerning the title to land of its indigenous peoples. Why did Eddie Mabo change his name to Mabo? He wrote: 'Membership of the Indigenous people depends on biological descent from the Indigenous people and on mutual recognition of a particular person's membership by that person and by the elders or other persons enjoying traditional authority among those people'. Marbury v. Madison, legal case in which, on February 24, 1803, the U.S. Supreme Court first declared an act of Congress unconstitutional, thus establishing the doctrine of judicial review. 0000002000 00000 n The Blainey view: Geoffrey Blainey ponders Mabo, the High Court and democracy. In 1981, Eddie Mabo made a speech at James Cook University in Queensland, where he explained his peoples beliefs about the ownership and inheritance of land on Mer. Mabo and Others v Queensland (No. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it. The Order of the High Court advised the decision, but it is the reasoning expressed in the majority judgments which shapes the law in a judicial case. Reynolds challenges Justice Dawson's minority judgement in Mabo, using history (specifically the history of European law and Colonial Office policy) to show that Dawson (and Blackburn) both misunderstood decisions to protect native title on pastoral leases between 1816 and 1855. We invite you to connect with us on social media. So that may well happen this time. 2 was decided. The key line in the majority opinion says this is a law that was specifically enacted to put Black people in a separate [train] carriage, and they said if there's any stigma here it's because Black people themselves are putting that construction on it. Short for Mabo and others v Queensland (No 2) (1992), the Mabo case, led by Eddie Kioiki Mabo, an activist for the 1967 Referendum, fought the legal concept that Australia and the Torres Strait Islands were not owned by Indigenous peoples because they did not use the land in ways Europeans believed constituted some . Ginsburg, however, offered three in late June 2013, including in the consequential voting rights case of Shelby County v . See ya."'. 0000009196 00000 n [Google Scholar]), 214 CLR 422 in relation to the need to demonstrate a continuing traditional connection with the land. A dissenting opinion is an opinion written by a justice who disagrees with the majority opinion. The Stanner Reading Room and client access rooms will be closed from, Guide to evaluating and selecting education resources, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people should be aware that this website may contain images, voices and names of deceased persons, Queensland Coast Islands Declaratory Act 1985, ABS:TheMaboCase, an articlecontributed by the Native Title Section of the Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet, From Keon-Cohen, B A, 'The Mabo Litigation: A Personal and Procedural Account'[2000] MelbULawRw 35; (2000) 24(3) Melbourne University Law Review 893, Records about adoption, fostering and institutions, Return of material to Indigenous communities, Alternative settlements and modelling loss and reparation for compensation, Indigenous languages preservation: Dictionaries project, Livelihood values of Indigenous customary fishing, Preserve, Strengthen and Renew in community, Report on the Situation and Status of Indigenous Cultures and Heritage, Third National Indigenous Languages Survey, Publishing a research publication with us, Native title access Imperialism, history, writing, and theory. We pay our respects to Elders past and present. The visit, as Moynihan J noted in his openingstatement,provided a better understanding of the evidence, and of island life. And Harlan didn't just call them out on the law. 0000011632 00000 n Corbis via Getty Images 3. You Murray Islanders have won that court case. Milirrpum still represents the law on traditional native land rights in Australia. Photo. On 3 June 1992, six of the seven High Court judges upheld the claim and ruled that the lands of this continent were not terra nullius or land belonging to no-one when European settlement occurred, and that the Meriam people were 'entitled as against the whole world to possession, occupation, use and enjoyment of (most of) the lands of the Murray Islands'. John Marshall Harlan, who was named for Chief Justice John Marshall, served on the Supreme Court from 1877 until his death in 1911. Many have applauded the decision as long overdue. Hello! 2) is among the most widely known and controversial decisions the Court has yet delivered. Our research contributes to the wellbeing of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people and has a direct benefit to the communities we work with. Th e judges held that British . 0000002901 00000 n [13], By the 1900s, the traditional economic life of the Torres Strait gave way to wage labouring on fishing boats mostly owned by others. [36], A straight-to-TV film titled Mabo was produced in 2012 by Blackfella Films in association with the ABC and SBS. 0000005372 00000 n 92/014. [Google Scholar]). Eddie Koiki Mabo was a Torres Strait Islander who believed Australian laws on land ownership were wrong and fought to change them. overturning the doctrine of terra nullius: the mabo case overview the mabo decision altered the foundation of land law in australia overturning the doctrine. disagreed with Brennan, J. to the extent that Brennan, J. held that native title could be extinguished by a clear legislative intent of the Crown without the need to pay compensation and without a breach of fiduciary duty by the Crown. Mabo gained an education, became an activist for black rights and worked with his community to make sure Aboriginal children had their own schools. The jurisprudence of emergency: Colonialism and the rule of law, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. When the Proclamation took effect on Jan. 1, 1863, Harlan denounced it as "unconstitutional and null and void." He did not resign over it, although, due to the death of his father, he did leave the army within a few months to care for his family and resume his career in law and politics. 2" Justice Dawson alone dissented. Four good reasons to indulge in cryptocurrency! The conversation went something like this: "Hello, Bryan Keon-Cohen here, whos that?" 0000001818 00000 n First, it recognised the entitlement of indigenous peo ple of Australia to a form of native land title. After some argument Moynihan J accepted the plaintiffs request that the court should adjourn and reconvene on Murray Island for three days, to take evidence, particularly from 16 witnesses, mainly elderly and frail, and also to take a view of the claimed areas of garden plots and adjacent seasWhen opening proceedings on the Island on 23 May 1989, Moynihan J doubted [whether] the Court has ever sat further north or perhaps further east, and certainly never before on Murray Island. says I. Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page %PDF-1.4 % 0000008513 00000 n The majority judgments in full are the largest, and perhaps also the plainest in appearance, of Australia's key constitutional documents. I am using case in its narrow legal sense in this context. 0000014730 00000 n Mabo Case (1992). According to positivist legal theory, this is a necessary function of common law judges: if courts are empowered to make authoritative determinations of the fact that a rule has been broken, these cannot avoid being taken as authoritative determinations of what the rules are. Justice Dawson, however, held that such rights exist only if recognised or acquiesced in by the Crown, and that this did not happen in this case. I think it's not too mysterious. Suggesting that neither judgment manages to escape the traces of racism, I argue that the alternative approaches tell us more about the fault lines within contemporary Australian political discourse than they do about the Australian colonial past. ( 2006 ). Sign in Register. Today, we discuss the devastating human cost of the "race grievance industry" he believes is [] Reverend David Passi, who gave evidence in the trial, explained that he believed that God had sent Malo to Mer island and that "Jesus Christ was where Malo was pointing. That court ruled against civil rights, it ruled against voting rights for African Americans. On this Wikipedia the language links are at the top of the page across from the article title. 0000002478 00000 n The aim of the legislation was toretrospectively extinguish the claimed rights of the Meriam people to the Murray Islands. Prior to Mabo, the pre-colonial property interests of Indigenous Australians were not recognised by the Australian legal system.
Wheeler Middle School Vice Principal, Sarasota County Dog Barking Laws, How Much Does Riggs Make At Barstool, Articles W